Tuesday 4 September 2012

Food-Stamp Use Climbs to Record, Reviving Campaign Issue


 Alan Bjerga 
Food-stamp use reached a record 46.7 million people in June, the government said, as Democrats prepare to nominate President Barack Obama for a second term with the economy as a chief issue in the campaign.
Participation was up 0.4 percent from May and 3.3 percent higher than a year earlier and has remained greater than 46 million all year as the unemployment rate stayed higher than 8 percent. New jobless numbers will be released Sept. 7.
“Too many middle-class families who have fallen on hard times are still struggling,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in an e-mailed statement today. “Our goal is to get these families the temporary assistance they need so they are able to get through these tough times and back on their feet as soon as possible.”
Food-stamp spending, which more than doubled in four years to a record $75.7 billion in the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2011, is the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s biggest annual expense. Republicans in Congress have criticized the cost of the program, and the House budget plan approved in April sponsored by Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the party’s vice- presidential nominee, would cut expenses by $33 billion over 10 years.
Cuts Planned
“We need a new direction,” Amanda Henneberg, a spokeswoman for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, said in an e-mail. “Democrats are desperately trying to convince voters that they are better off than they were four years ago. But the opposite is true,” as evidenced by the food- stamp numbers, she said.
Reductions to the program have also emerged as a point of contention in debate over a farm bill to replace current law that expires Sept. 30. The U.S. Senate in June passed a plan that would lower expenditures by $4 billion over 10 years, while the House Agriculture Committee the following month backed a $16 billion cut.
During the Republican primary campaign, then-candidate Newt Gingrich labeled Obama as “the best food-stamp president in American history.” When the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People called his statements “inaccurate” and “divisive,” Gingrich dismissed the complaints as a smear from “modern liberals” who are “off the deep end.”
Food-stamp enrollment is rising partly because the USDA is pushing higher participation too aggressively, giving government money to people who may not need or want it, U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions said in a telephone interview.
‘Government Incompetence’
“This administration has been hawking food stamps,” said the Alabama Republican, who has called for lower spending on the program. “Every additional dollar in this program is borrowed money,” he said. “It’s one more example of government incompetence.”
Today’s report shows the two most populous states, California and Texas, had the most recipients. California was tops with 4.012 million, a 0.8 percent gain from the previous month and 7.3 percent more than the previous year. Texas was in second place, while down 0.4 percent from the previous month and 1.4 percent lower than a year earlier.
Louisiana and North Carolina, where Democrats are meeting this week to nominate Obama, had the biggest monthly gains in enrollment, 1.3 percent. Enrollment fell the most in Utah, down 1.4 percent from May, followed by Idaho and Ohio.
Spending on what’s officially called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program totaled $6.21 billion in June, 0.4 percent higher than the previous month and 2.8 percent more than a year earlier. The record is $6.26 billion spent in September 2011.
About 47 percent of recipients are children, and 8 percent are elderly, according to the USDA. About half of all new recipients leave the program within 10 months.
 Original Article Here

5 Agriculture Covered Calls: JOY, CNH, DE, IR, CAT


In the endless search for yield, a covered-call strategy can be an effective tool to supplement portfolio performance. In addition to finding returns from call premium, I'll try to incorporate higher quality dividend stocks for a little something extra. The guidelines for the covered-call strategy are:
Generating more than 7% per year from the calls and dividends combined is the overall goal.
Call should be at least 8% out of the money (OTM), to avoid being called away and to give room for underlying movement.
Targeted expirations will be within 4 months. Optimally calls will be written on the same underlying 3-4 times per year.
Buying back calls to close before expirations takes place will be taken into account; yields are calculated bid-$0.05.
The picks should be looked upon as yield generators to supplement longer-term equity holdings. The above are only guidelines, however, not rules. Before utilizing the strategy, make sure to study it and know the potential hiccups that may occur.
Annualized Call Yield performance can be calculated as such:
= (Call premium - 0.05 /Stock price)/Days to expiration*365
Prices current as of September 4, 2012 market close
Summary on selection:
Although I don't believe it is a good time to buy stock, the agriculture sector is typically represented in most long-term oriented portfolios and this is why it has been chosen for this article. These options may match up nicely if you would like to generate extra income on solid agricultural stocks. Additional income should be sought specifically while the financial markets are still murky with the Euro crisis and impending US political issues.
Joy Global Inc. (JOY) October 57.5 call
Ticker
JOY
Strike
57.5
Exp Month
October
Stock Price
$51.65
Call Bid
$1.15
Days to Expiration
46
OTM
11.33%
Call Yield
2.13%
Annualized Call Yield
16.90%
Annual Dividend Yield
1.30%
Total Annual Yield
18.20%
CNH Global N.V. (CNH) October 45 call
Ticker
CNH
Strike
45
Exp Month
October
Stock Price
$40.18
Call Bid
$0.45
Days to Expiration
46
OTM
12.00%
Call Yield
1.00%
Annualized Call Yield
7.90%
Annual Dividend Yield
0.00%
Total Annual Yield
7.90%
Deere & Company (DE) October 80 call
Ticker
DE
Strike
80
Exp Month
October
Stock Price
$74.12
Call Bid
$0.45
Days to Expiration
46
OTM
7.93%
Call Yield
0.54%
Annualized Call Yield
4.28%
Annual Dividend Yield
2.40%
Total Annual Yield
6.68%
Ingersoll-Rand plc (IR) October 49 call
Ticker
IR
Strike
49
Exp Month
October
Stock Price
$45.85
Call Bid
$0.62
Days to Expiration
46
OTM
6.87%
Call Yield
1.24%
Annualized Call Yield
9.86%
Annual Dividend Yield
1.40%
Total Annual Yield
11.26%
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) October 90 call
Ticker
CAT
Strike
90
Exp Month
October
Stock Price
$82.66
Call Bid
$0.81
Days to Expiration
46
OTM
8.88%
Call Yield
0.92%
Annualized Call Yield
7.30%
Annual Dividend Yield
2.52%
Total Annual Yield
9.82%
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article
Original Article Here

US Agriculture after the Closing Bell Report


US Agriculture after the Closing Bell Report
Wheat futures ended in the low-range. Chicago and Minneapolis Wheat closed narrowly mixed, while Kansas City Wheat settled with slight gains in all but the front-month, which was fractionally lower. A flurry of Wheat export buys this weekend and today initially supported Wheat futures, but as gains in the Corn market faded, attention shifted to the fact many countries were meeting their Wheat needs via cheaper alternatives to US supplies.
Corn futures fought back from an early afternoon price slump to finish 0.0375 to 0.0775 higher, although that was well off session highs. Corn futures got the bulk of their price support from the Soybean market Tuesday. But news that Japan purchased 180,000 metric tons of US Corn for MY 2013-14 provided some fundamental support.
Soybean futures posted an all-time high of 17.89 on the weekly continuation chart, but ended low-range. Sept through Jan futures ended with gains of 0.065 to 0.1525, with the rest of the market closing mostly 0.30+ higher. Soymeal ended mixed amid Bull spread unwinding, with Soyoil stronger. Early support in the Soybean pit came from ideas the market had more work ahead of it to ration shrinking supplies.
Lean Hog futures finished mixed, with Oct and Dec up 0.025 to 0.05, respectively. The rest of the market closed steady to 0.575 lower. Nearby lean Hog futures favored a weaker tone most of the day but posted a high-range close as traders worked to narrow the discount nearby’s hold to the cash index. The cash index is projected down 1.69 to stand at 78.60.
Live Cattle futures closed 0.05 to 0.45 higher in all but some of the extreme far-deferred contracts following a light day of trade. Live Cattle futures were supported by surprising strength in the cash Cattle market, as packers paid 2.00 to 3.00 higher prices for cash Cattle late Friday. But buying interest was limited by the fact futures already hold a 3.00 + premium to the top end of last week’s cash range
Live Asia Markets
Live Europe Markets
Live USA Markets
Visit Livetradingnews.com for the Latest Stock Market News Live
Live Agricultural Markets
Live Commodities Market
Original Article Here

SBA Offers Economic Injury Disaster Loans in Tennessee Following Secretary of Agriculture Disaster Declaration for Drought Published: September 4, 2012


ATLANTA, SEPT. 4, 2012 — /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Small Business Administration announced today that federal economic injury disaster loans are available to small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, small businesses engaged in aquaculture and most private non-profit organizations of all sizes located in Chester, Fayette, Hardeman, Haywood, Madison and McNairy counties in Tennessee as a result of the drought that occurred between July 3 and August 27, 2012. 
(Logo:http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20110909/DC65875LOGO)
"When the Secretary of Agriculture issues a disaster declaration to help farmers recover from damages and losses to crops, the Small Business Administration issues a declaration to eligible entities affected by the same disaster," said Frank Skaggs, director of SBA's Field Operations Center East in Atlanta.
Under this declaration, the SBA's Economic Injury Disaster Loan program is available to eligible farm-related and nonfarm-related entities that suffered financial losses as a direct result of this disaster. With the exception of aquacultural enterprises, SBA cannot provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers or ranchers. Nurseries are eligible to apply for economic injury disaster loans for losses caused by drought conditions.
The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates of 3 percent for private non-profit organizations of all sizes and 4 percent for small businesses, with terms up to 30 years.  The SBA determines eligibility based on the size of the applicant, type of activity and its financial resources.  Loan amounts and terms are set by the SBA and are based on each applicant's financial condition.  These working capital loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other bills that could have been paid had the disaster not occurred.  The loans are not intended to replace lost sales or profits.
Applicants may apply online using the Electronic Loan Application (ELA) via SBA's secure website at https://disasterloan.sba.gov/ela.
Disaster loan information and application forms may also be obtained by calling the SBA's Customer Service Center at 800-659-2955 (800-877-8339 for the deaf and hard-of-hearing) or by sending an email to disastercustomerservice@sba.gov.  Loan applications can be downloaded from the SBA's website at www.sba.gov.  Completed applications should be mailed to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 
Original Article Here

Ex-U.S. Rep. Charlie Rose helped tobacco farmers


RALEIGH -- – Former U.S. Rep. Charlie Rose, who used his seat on the House Agriculture Committee to help farmers and protect the tobacco crops that brought wealth to farmers in his North Carolina district, has died, his wife said Tuesday.
Rose, 73, died of Parkinson’s disease at a hospital near their northern Alabama home, said his wife, Stacye Hefner. Rose was diagnosed with the degenerative brain disorder last year, Hefner said.
Rose, a Democrat, spent 24 years in Washington representing the 7th Congressional District, which included his hometown of Fayetteville and much of North Carolina’s southeastern region. Elected in 1972, the attorney and former prosecutor became one of the most powerful lawmakers in Congress and used his seat on the House Agriculture Committee to back the interests of farmers, especially tobacco growers back home.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/09/05/2317418/ex-us-rep-charlie-rose-helped.html#storylink=cpy
Rose’s successor in the 7th District was his former intern, Democrat Mike McIntyre, who is seeking re-election this November.
As chairman in the early 1990s of the House Administration Committee – which oversees office space, security, and lawmaker expenses – Rose was nicknamed the “mayor of the Capitol” and was said to be looking for an opening to run for speaker of the House.
But the Washington dealmaker found himself in the House minority for the first time in his career when Republicans led by soon-to-be House Speaker Newt Gingrich won broad gains in the 1994 elections.
Rose said the election resulted in a Congress full of “ideologues unwilling to compromise,” adding that they “over-promised or narrowly dedicated themselves to solving one or two issues.”
John Merritt, a longtime friend of Rose and his former chief of staff, said that Rose had a well-deserved reputation as one North Carolina’s most skilled politicians.
“A lot of people come and go and you wonder if they were ever really there,” Merritt said. “With Charlie there was no question.”
Merritt said Rose’s fascination with technology, while lesser-known than his contribution to agriculture issues, is just as important to his legacy.
Rose pushed the House of Representatives to televise its activities on C-SPAN, helped bring computers and fiber optics to Congress and was “behind just about every tech advancement Congress made while he was there,” Merritt said.
His interest in technology spilled into other areas of his life. Rose worked as a photographer at The News & Observer while he was an undergraduate student at Davidson College, and Merritt said he was the first to get anything new that came out, often before manufacturers even put new products on the shelves.
“In the mid-1970s, he even had an electric car,” Merritt said. “He would drive it all over Washington. It rode like an ox cart and always got looks, but he was on the edge of emerging technology.”
Rose announced his retirement in 1996 and started lobbying Washington with his third wife, the daughter of Rep. Bill Hefner, D-N.C.
“They had served together for 24 years. They were really, really best buddies,” Stacye Hefner said.
Rose and his wife moved to Albertville, Ala., to be near her mother after Bill Hefner died in 2009. The Roses largely gave up their lobbying work with the move.
Tony Rand, a former state senator and law partner of Rose, said he was one of the last of the great Southern Democrats of that era.
“He was great at working with people and getting things done. He loved the political process,” Rand said. “In his day, he was as good of a politician as I ever saw up close.”
Original Article Here

Easy Trade platform combines N.American agriculture with energy


(Reuters) - Progressive Fuels Limited's new trading platform is the first to let players in energy and agricultural markets in North America to incorporate mandated growing renewable fuel use into their trading strategies, the company said on Tuesday.
Called Easy Trade, the program supports real-time clearing for trade in natural gas, crude oil, heating oil, RBOB, ethanol, power and all grain markets.
"With North American government mandates, public support for greater energy security and more environmentally conscious fuel alternatives, the biofuel and grain markets will continue to expand and trade more actively." said Curtis Chandler, president of the company.
In 2012, government mandates call for 13.2 billion gallons (50 billion liters) of conventional renewable fuels like ethanol, up from 12.6 billion gallons in 2011, as required by the U.S. EPA. Total conventional renewable fuel component for 2022 is mandated at 15 billion gallons.
The Easy Trade platform was developed in conjunction with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange .
 Original Article Here

How Agriculture Stacks Up on the Fiscal Cliff


The Congressional Budget Office recently released its latest update on the budget and economic situation last week which showed a grim picture for the economy if Congress allows it to go over the so-called "fiscal cliff."
The term fiscal cliff is often used to describe the mix of automatic tax increases and spending cuts expected at the end of this year. For agriculture this is important in terms of the nation's appetite for spending, interest rates and other key tax changes including estate and capital gains taxes.
The CBO report said the nation would be plunged into recession and unemployment would again grow to more than 9% if Congress allows the economy to go over the so-called fiscal cliff.
"This is another red-flag warning us of what we already know: Our nation's current economic path is unsustainable and time for action is growing short,” said Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., “Congress must get serious about where we're heading and act in a bipartisan fashion before our economic train runs off the cliff.”
In remarks to the Western Dakota Estate Planning Council, Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said he continues to meet with a small group of Republican and Democratic senators who are working on a bipartisan and balanced long-term deficit reduction plan, while upwards of 40-plus Republican and Democratic Senators are supporting and encouraging their efforts. The group believes deficits need to be reduced by at least some $4 trillion over the next 10 years, and is using the much heralded Simpson-Bowles Fiscal Commission plan as its framework.
Conrad said a lot of important behind-the-scenes work is being done now. He expressed concern that if unchanged, the Fiscal Cliff could harm the near-term economy. He went on to say that the pressure to avoid the Fiscal Cliff could help prompt lawmakers to take on the politically difficult task of passing a comprehensive plan.
“As we look to avoid the Fiscal Cliff, it is my hope that we can replace the scheduled arbitrary, across-the-board sequester cuts and tax increases with even more savings from a balanced and comprehensive plan, like the Bowles-Simpson framework, that includes savings from entitlements, including health care, and tax reform that raises revenue,” said Conrad.
In talks last fall to avoid sequestration, the House and Senate agriculture committees were the most successful at proposing budget savings by sketching out a farm bill framework that provided $23 billion in cuts.
Even if the House never passes a farm bill, a similar type of proposal could again come up this fall after the election, said Pat Westhoff, director of the University of Missouri's Food & Agricultural Policy Research Institute.
If the election solidifies the status quo of a Democrat-controlled Senate and Democrat as President, there is a good chance that the farm bill could be included during lame-duck discussions of larger budgetary savings and extending certain tax benefits, he noted.
If Republicans take over both chambers of Congress and the presidency, those major items are less likely to get done during the lame-duck session and instead would be pushed to January, using short-term extensions to last from now until then, Westhoff said. In theory, this could mean that lawmakers may have to start from scratch on the farm bill, with a much bigger bull's-eye on spending.
Original Article Here

Opinion: the dual drought grip on U.S. agriculture


By Greenscans co-founder and BerryBroad Juanita Gaglio 
It has been a summer that both farmers and consumers will not forget, with two droughts very different in nature that have been affecting retail prices. We view news images of scorching farmland and cattle suffering, due to a prolonged 
period of no rain with record-breaking high temperatures adversely affecting 55% of the U.S. To make matters worse, on another front we are facing a labor drought due to a shortage of legally available agricultural workers.
Prolonged dry spell in Midwest and Southeast
More than half of all U.S counties have been designated disaster zones by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Not since the 1956 drought has such a large geographic area (55%) of the country been impacted. The historic Dust Bowl era is well known with a drought that covered 58% of the U.S. in that year.  The situation affecting farmers, their livestock and crops, and even the flow of the Mississippi River, is as heartbreaking today as it was back then.
At the turn of the century, settlers arrived to farm the rich land of the Southern Plain states that yielded both great harvests and profits. Iowa-based Three Rivers Ag Consulting owner Frank Moore, who is also a corn and soybean farmer, explains that this geographical area of the U.S has historically experienced an 18-year drought cycle for the last 17 years.
“In contrast to the past drought conditions, this has been the longest period, twenty-four years, that the area has gone through without a drought occurring,” he tells www.freshfruitportal.com.
Lessons from the past have vastly improved farm practices with better soil conservation and modern hybrid seeds that are resistant to drought conditions two to three years away, yet the main concern today is the pernicious extended dry spell.
“The drought actually began in November and has been characterized by lots of geographical variability. There was a lot of variability even in the same field,” adds Dan Towery of Ag Conservation Solutions in Lafayette, Indiana.
“The drought affected pockets of corn and soybean crops with corn hit the worst due to the crops requirements for more water.  With corn in such wide demand from feeding cattle and in materials, many people are suffering and are going to see it in increased prices.”
He says corn crops were very short on moisture when 100°F (37.8°C) plus temperatures arrived, greatly affecting pollination or causing corn kernels to abort. However, he clarifies there are still pockets of farms with decent crops and areas with 50% yields, while some soybean farms have fared all right.
“Soybean yields may still be halfway decent although in some areas the soybeans burned up back in July.”
Generational farmers are commenting that they have never seen weather like this before. What makes this dry spell different and of concern is that climatologist have labeled it a “flash drought” because in contrast to what happened in 1956, it did not develop over multiple seasons or years, but in a matter of months and is still unfolding.
With no end in sight, topsoil has turned dry while “crops, pasture and rangeland have deteriorated at a rate rarely seen in the last 18 years”, according to the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) based in Asheville, North Carolina.
What was expected to be a boom year for corn farmers sowing 96.4 million acres – the most since 1937 – has now given way to tremendous uncertainty with 38% of the corn crop described as labeled in poor or very poor condition by the USDA, with 57% of pastures and range land graded very poor to poor.
California – San Joaquin Valley experiences a different “Grapes of Wrath”
The famous novel “The Grapes of Wrath” by John Steinbeck came out of the Dust Bowl period; a story of one of many families migrating to California’s farming fields. It is estimated that during this time about 300,000-400,000 people moved to California with a certain percentage relocating to farm labor camps.
Fast forward decades later, a similar climatic situation exists in the Plain states with a political impasse in California leaving crops to rot in fields due to lack of immigrant labor. According to the Immigration Compliance Group, “an estimated 75% of California’s agricultural workforce is foreign-born, primarily in Mexico and about half the workers are believed to be unauthorized”. A political compromise has yet to be found between the government’s mandated E-Verify and the proposed guest worker program, and it is our nation’s agricultural industry that suffers as a result.
The problem extends much further than California, from the apple fields in Washington to the orange farms of Florida and fruit orchards in between. It seems the government is in crackdown mode with the election year, meaning fewer farmers are willing to risk taking in illegal workers.
We’re talking about a political football without any touchdown in sight, and the game has gone nowhere under both parties dating back to the Bush Jnr administration. It’s no secret that most farmers are Republicans but somehow the party has done little to resolve this issue, while Obama hasn’t helped the situation with more restrictions now than before.
It seems like common sense to me that one of our country’s biggest industries could support itself with legal labor. Sound idealistic? Well it shouldn’t be. Our nation is built on the free market ideal, so it shouldn’t be that half our agricultural workers are unauthorized. There must be a way to ‘legalize’ them so that our economy and labor markets can flow more freely. They’re doing the job anyway, supporting the economy and our exports.
The idea of ‘legalizing’ does not even mean making these workers residents or citizens, but giving them the dignity of being authorized, rather than hiding away from authorities to make a living. A change in this policy to a more dynamic guest worker scheme would improve the welfare of ‘illegals’ who could no longer be labeled this way, as well as the farmers who employ them; not to mention there would be less fruit left to rot on our farms. An election year should not be the excuse for labor problems, but the trigger for immigrant worker reform.
Getting our own people to work?
The other question is whether we could get more U.S. citizens working on our farms. It has been a difficult task in the past, but you have to keep in mind that our unemployment rate hit 8.3% in July, and that doesn’t include people who have given up looking. I was shocked to see Americans picking fruit as guest workers in Tasmania on a trip to Australia last year, and when I told that to people here in California they were surprised too. Here we are with a shortage of farm labor and our own citizens are on the other side of the Pacific Ocean harvesting asparagus.
If our young people are willing to go as far away as Tasmania to pick fruit, why can’t we get them to move across our own country? It probably has to do with a mix of cultural experience and the wages they pay to work on farms in Australia, at more than US$20 an hour. I’m pretty sure most farm owners would laugh off the idea of paying such an exorbitant rate, but the reality is that most developed countries pay their farmhands more than we do, and they still manage to compete. Every season we still buy fruit from places like Australia, New Zealand and the European Union.
Is it really unimaginable that young unemployed Americans would be willing to travel across the country for the cultural experience of working on a farm, perhaps with a slightly higher wage? Maybe they wouldn’t be willing to do it, or maybe it hasn’t been promoted. I would be interested to know if it has. Could the government provide assistance to help push up the wage and attract workers? After all our taxes go towards billions of dollars worth of crop insurance subsidies ever year.
If we don’t find some kind of solution to this labor problem it will ultimately mean less production here and more imports from abroad.
Affects of both droughts on farmers, consumers and importers
Both droughts could have dire consequences on the anemic U.S economy both in lost income to farmers and higher retail food prices to consumers. The U.S is the world’s largest grower and exporter of corn, government figures show, the crop valued at $76.5 billion in 2011 followed by soybeans, hay and wheat.
Furthermore, investors and insurance analysts are raising questions over the farmland boom’s sustainability. Insurance payments are beginning to play a bigger role in supporting the farmer and land prices. In the case of the California labor drought, California crops will continue to be at peril without people to work the harvest and, furthermore, according to California Senator Diane Feinstein, at least 84,155 production acres and 22,285 jobs have moved to Mexico.
In the case of corn, the question is who will benefit or suffer; the consumer, cattle or the refinery? The consumer will have sticker shock as corn can be found in everything from whiskey to high fructose syrup to ethanol. High corn prices will affect where the corn goes first; to feed cattle or to refineries for ethanol. Calls to waive the ethanol mandate are growing and livestock feed is being rationed. One thing is certain, with the lack of corn and soybeans to fulfill contracts, Argentina and Brazil will benefit in shipping these crops to North America companies.
Although consumers will not see immediate price hikes at the supermarket, the government forecasts that food prices will rise by about 3.4-4.5%. The USDA estimates that a whole chicken costing US$4.50 in 2011 will cost closer to US$5 next year. A typical family food budget could increase to US$250-300 within 10-12 months on basic items; beef, poultry and dairy products, according to the USDA Economic Research Service.
The jury is still out on the financial blow to crops and livestock, with some analysts raising concerns that this drought could turn into the type of multilayered event that damaged the farm belt in the 1950s and  before that during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. Could this be the resurrection of the 1930s “Last Man’s Club”?
During the bleak Dust Bowl days, John McCarty, editor of the Dalhart Texan created The Last Man’s Club, designed to promote a spirit of courage. Judge Cowen recalls the pledge members had to sign: “In the absence of an act of God, serious family injury, or some other emergency, I pledge to stay here as the last man and to do everything I can to help other last men remain in this country. We promise to stay here ’till hell freezes over and skate out on the ice”.
The Midwest drought will be easier to make a comeback with heartier crop cover and hybrid seeds to withstand intense heat, but on the other side of the country, the California labor drought will not be as easy to ameliorate. Politics does not blow like the winds of nature, there will be further debate and I daresay that the Midwest will make a comeback before the immigrant workers return to work the “Grapes of Wrath” in California.
 Original Article Here

Guest Post: Agriculture and Employment in Africa


This is a guest post by Owen Cylke. Mr. Cylke is a development professional and a retired senior foreign service officer with USAID.
This year 10 million young Africans will enter the workforce. This number will continue to increase until 2030 when it will peak at about 18 million annual new entrants to the workforce.
With seventy percent of the African population (and poverty) firmly rooted in rural areas, and development strategies focused on agriculture, will farms be able to absorb these numbers? Demonstrably not.
Africa today is the only region in the world where agriculture continues to play the leading role in economic growth and employment. But subsistence farms are already too small to absorb additional labor. Commercial farms are dependent on improving productivity, by definition labor displacing.
African leaders recognize agricultural employment cannot keep pace with population growth, and are promoting a shift towards manufacturing, and other types of industrial production and services.
What does this mean for public policy? First, that a development strategy focused almost exclusively on agriculture is only half right. True, agriculture is necessary to provide increased food supplies and higher rural incomes. And agriculture will have to play an important role in the transition to other types of economic activity, such as enlarging markets for urban output. But, as noted above, agricultural success carries with it a declining relevance to the growing pool of employment seekers.
Second, a shift from agriculture to industry will not necessarily guarantee enough jobs to meet demand. Today’s labor markets are characterized by informality, inequity, and unreliability – this largely the result of the laissez faire, free market approaches promoted by the international development and economic communities.
Public policy must play a role – a policy regime that extends beyond agriculture (PDF) (and even labor markets themselves) to macroeconomic policy, financial institutions, international economic arrangements, territorial development, demographics, migration and gender policy.
Third, neither the desired sectoral shift nor employment goals will be accomplished automatically. In addition to public policy, they will need an international development and aid strategy that links to and is supportive of that policy.
Today, African thinking and direction stand in uneasy tension with the fixed focus of the international development and economic communities on agriculture and their insistence on the primacy of the market. This tension exists despite the aspirations of the Paris/Accra Declaration on AID Effectiveness (PDF).
Original Article Here

Indonesia's corn imports seen down 35 percent in 2012


High global corn prices will contribute to Indonesian imports falling by about 35 percent to 2 million tonnes this year, an industry group said on Tuesday. Global grain supplies have been depleted by a devastating drought in the United States, the world's top exporter, with US corn futures climbing about 50 percent since the start of June.

Indonesia overtook Malaysia to become Southeast Asia's largest corn importer last year with 3.1 million tonnes, Tony Kristianto, vice chairman at the Indonesian Corn Board said. Heavy rains followed by extreme heat in Indonesia, ruined the crop in the main growing areas last year, boosting import numbers.

"Higher prices," Kristianto told Reuters when asked about the reasons for the expected import dip, adding that there may be more plantings in the second half of this year. "Feed mills are importing at higher prices, so they try and get more local production and pay more."

Southeast Asia's largest economy gets about 60 percent of its corn imports from Argentina and the United States, with India an alternative supplier. Feed mill demand for corn accounts for about 70 percent Indonesian consumption of about 9 million tonnes per year, added Kristianto, whose group was established ten years ago.

Earlier this year, the Indonesian Feed Mill Association said corn imports would fall by 2 million tonnes to 1.5 million tonnes, due to a surge in domestic output. "The outlook is that the US corn price is going higher and we will then follow it," Kristianto said. In January, Indonesian feed mills paid around 2,500 rupiah ($0.26) per kg of corn, but this had now risen to almost 3,500 rupiah ($0.37) per kg, Bogor-based Kristianto added.

Rising prices will lead to an increase in slaughtered birds in the poultry industry, while more Indonesians are likely to switch to meat substitutes like tofu and tempe that are cheaper. Corn output in the archipelago will be between 8-9 million tonnes this year, little changed from last year, added Kristianto, a consultant with more than 25 years experience in the agriculture industry.

Indonesia's main corn crop is usually in the first quarter, with a mid-crop around September. "Not a big increase," he added. "We have a systemic problem in our country in food crops we have problems with land, policy, systems - the autonomous system in Indonesia ruins all efforts to grow agriculture. "Central government may have plans or programs but they cannot be executed because the bupati (district head) doesn't support it." 
Original Article Here

A new trend of agriculture feminization


n the field of agricultural and rural development, gender issues have now become an important part. Many reports indicate that there is a changing gender role in agricultural activities. The involvement and the significant role of women in daily farming operations has been noticed and noted globally.

Although men are involved in daily agricultural operations, due to the increase of the various needs of a household’s economy, their involvement in daily agricultural activities has considerably decreased. Men, in many cases, have diversified their activities from solely on-farm, to also off-farm and non-farm work, in order to generate more cash income.

In general, land ownership could only generate small income through farming. In addition, due to the limitation of asset ownership, farming households could only operate a small scale alternative farming business, such as livestock and fish breeding. Now, agriculture no longer serves as a single income source, and men have been expanding their activities beyond the farm.

The reduction of men’s involvement in on-farm activities, and the intensification of their role in off-farm or non-farm activities, to some extent force women to take more care of daily farming activities. Heavy work such as land preparation will be handled by men; while other activities will be given to women. However, in dry, upland areas, women are also involved in land preparation (Subejo, 2011).

Today, rural women are becoming more involved in many more of the farming operations than was the case in the past. Traditionally, women were associated with light and delicate work such as planting, weeding and harvesting, while men focused on hard or physically demanding jobs, such as land preparation and transporting crops.

The role of women laborers in large scale farming has also greatly increased. In many horticultural farms that grow things such as vegetables, fruits and flowers, the role of women workers is also increasing.

This recent phenomenon of the domination of women in various agricultural activities is regarded by many researchers as the “feminization of agriculture”. The role of women is also not restricted to food production, for instance, women in rural India have been the main source of labor in dairy farms and related industries.

Despite the increasingly important role of women, policies to improve women’s participation in agricultural activities remain very limited. The gender-biased policy gives women less opportunities in some respects, such as technology development, information access and level of labor payment.

Indications of gender-bias in technology policy development and transfer are obvious in developing countries. Men are given more advantages and chances to access agricultural technologies, knowledge and information than women, because of their status as household leaders. Invitations to formal meetings, such as on various field farming practices, is commonly only extended to household heads (men), or their sons. Women may attend such meetings only if they are widows.

Further, knowledge and information on various topics related to farming operations is transferred mostly to men. And worse still, the transfer of knowledge and information from men to women occurs at a glacial speed.

Development of gender-biased agricultural technologies is something entrenched in the industry. My study in 2010 found that agricultural technologies, such as transplanting machines, pesticide sprayers, tractors, and harvesters, are designed to be operated by men.

While women have been playing a more dominant role in rural farming, the machines or agricultural tools available are not suitable for them.

With regard to labor payment, my study in Central Java’s rural area reveals that labor payment in farming activities varies between operational and gender structures, as well as contract systems. There are some differences between the wages paid to men and women. Men are commonly involved in heavier, or more physically demanding jobs, and therefore deserve a higher wage.

In fact, many farming activities that currently are undertaken by women also need tight and delicate work, such as transplanting, weeding, harvesting and threshing. Commonly there is no difference in term of working hours between men and women, so theoretically women should receive at least an equal wages. But so far, it has not been the case.

New strategies are badly needed to empower rural women. These may take the shape of gaining access to agricultural meetings, training and practices, as well as the invention of technologies sensitive to women, or farming machines which can be operated by both women and men.

Rural administrative and field extension workers should also be more gender sensitive; they should provide greater chances to rural women of being involved in farming extension practices, as well as knowledge and information transfer. Invitations to meetings could be addressed to all persons who are involved in daily farming activities — including housewives or their daughters.

In case of making the system of labor payment a fairer one, differentiation could be made based on the type or characteristics of the activity. Either way, men and women who do the same activity should earn an equal amount of pay. 
Original Article Here

Sri Lanka's travel advisory: Textile, agriculture traders will be hit


HENNAI: The Sri Lankan government's decision to issue an advisory to its citizens against travelling to Tamil Nadu may adversely impact trade between the two neighbours, resulting in a loss of opportunity for textile and commodity businesses here. In the near term, the impact may be felt by the smaller businesses.
"Numerous Lankans shop in T Nagar for their wedding purchases. I know each Lankan boarding the plane back to Colombo carries 40 sarees each. The margins are nearly 100% for these sarees. These guys may get impacted," trade sources said."Businesses of small traders and unorganized traders could be affected as they might not be able to ship directly to Chennai and would have to route it through Mumbai or such other locations," C S Muthu Subramaniyan, President of the India-ASEAN Sri LankaChamber of Commerce and Industry said. If the issue continues to simmer, and identity politics and Lankan war crimes remain the key issues for regional parties until the next Lok Sabha elections, the environment may become unfavourable for bigger businesses such as those involved in hospitality, tourism, commodities too.
"South Indians, particularly farmers and sugar companies from Tamil Nadu will be affected," said Somi Hazari, managing director of the Chennai-based Shosova group. Shosova is into export and import of edible oils and other food items.Other commodities like onions and lentils from other parts of India too are exported to Sri Lanka via Tamil Nadu because of proximity to Sri Lanka and price competitiveness. 
Original Article Here

Department of Agriculture to relocate its HQ to north west Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/department-of-agriculture-to-relocate-its-hq-to-north-west-16206548.html#ixzz25Z2f2att

Noel McAdam
An entire Northern Ireland Government department is on the move in a bid to boost public sector jobs in the hard-hit north west.
Around 800 jobs are being shifted from Belfast close to Londonderry — but it is not clear how many of the existing staff are happy to relocate.
The long-awaited decision will also mean a Sinn Fein minister being given a new headquarters at a former British Army base.
The Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD) — headed by Michelle O’Neill — is being uprooted and replanted at the former military barracks site at Ballykelly.
It is where the Irish National Liberation Army (INLA) planted a bomb at a disco almost 30 years ago, killing 11 soldiers and six civilians in what became known as the Droppin’ Well massacre.
Now long vacant, the Shackleton base was one of a number of former Ministry of Defence-owned properties gifted to the Executive.
After more than two years of discussions, a final decision to shift DARD was finalised at the first Stormont Executive meeting of the autumn on Monday.
For years its base has been at Dundonald House, less than a mile from Stormont Castle in east Belfast, although it had come under increasing pressures in recent years — including flooding earlier this summer.
But none of the current 800-plus staff will be forced to make the move.
Ms O’Neill said she intends to work with staff and trade unions to ensure the transition is as smooth as possible.
Work is due to begin on the site next year, but could take more than 18 months, with the the new headquarters ready for occupation in 2015.
A total of £13m for the project was set aside in the current Stormont Budget, with the hope of an equal amount in the next Budget period.
MLAs had lobbied for a number of locations including the Ards Peninsula, Mid-Ulster, Lagan Valley and Craigavon.
There had been speculation the new HQ would be at Loughry, near Cookstown, where the minister already works one day per week.
Another possibility was the former Maze prison.
But on Monday the minister ended months of speculation when she said: “For too long the only opportunity for people to be civil servants, and to gain promotion in their jobs, has been in the greater Belfast area.
“This will allow some people to work closer to home.”
East Londonderry MP Gregory Campbell said it was welcome good news for an area which has seen many job losses.
Background
A project team to examine the relocation of the Department of Agriculture met for the first time in March last year. After four meetings, it finalised a paper which looked at the likely “human resource” issues for the approximate 800 DARD staff. Sinn Fein retained the Agriculture portfolio following last year’s Assembly election, with Michelle O’Neill taking over from Michelle Gildernew. Initial recommendations were made to ministers earlier this year.
Original Article Here

 
Powered by Blogger