Tuesday, 4 September 2012

US Agriculture after the Closing Bell Report


US Agriculture after the Closing Bell Report
Wheat futures ended in the low-range. Chicago and Minneapolis Wheat closed narrowly mixed, while Kansas City Wheat settled with slight gains in all but the front-month, which was fractionally lower. A flurry of Wheat export buys this weekend and today initially supported Wheat futures, but as gains in the Corn market faded, attention shifted to the fact many countries were meeting their Wheat needs via cheaper alternatives to US supplies.
Corn futures fought back from an early afternoon price slump to finish 0.0375 to 0.0775 higher, although that was well off session highs. Corn futures got the bulk of their price support from the Soybean market Tuesday. But news that Japan purchased 180,000 metric tons of US Corn for MY 2013-14 provided some fundamental support.
Soybean futures posted an all-time high of 17.89 on the weekly continuation chart, but ended low-range. Sept through Jan futures ended with gains of 0.065 to 0.1525, with the rest of the market closing mostly 0.30+ higher. Soymeal ended mixed amid Bull spread unwinding, with Soyoil stronger. Early support in the Soybean pit came from ideas the market had more work ahead of it to ration shrinking supplies.
Lean Hog futures finished mixed, with Oct and Dec up 0.025 to 0.05, respectively. The rest of the market closed steady to 0.575 lower. Nearby lean Hog futures favored a weaker tone most of the day but posted a high-range close as traders worked to narrow the discount nearby’s hold to the cash index. The cash index is projected down 1.69 to stand at 78.60.
Live Cattle futures closed 0.05 to 0.45 higher in all but some of the extreme far-deferred contracts following a light day of trade. Live Cattle futures were supported by surprising strength in the cash Cattle market, as packers paid 2.00 to 3.00 higher prices for cash Cattle late Friday. But buying interest was limited by the fact futures already hold a 3.00 + premium to the top end of last week’s cash range
Live Asia Markets
Live Europe Markets
Live USA Markets
Visit Livetradingnews.com for the Latest Stock Market News Live
Live Agricultural Markets
Live Commodities Market
Original Article Here

SBA Offers Economic Injury Disaster Loans in Tennessee Following Secretary of Agriculture Disaster Declaration for Drought Published: September 4, 2012


ATLANTA, SEPT. 4, 2012 — /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Small Business Administration announced today that federal economic injury disaster loans are available to small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, small businesses engaged in aquaculture and most private non-profit organizations of all sizes located in Chester, Fayette, Hardeman, Haywood, Madison and McNairy counties in Tennessee as a result of the drought that occurred between July 3 and August 27, 2012. 
(Logo:http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20110909/DC65875LOGO)
"When the Secretary of Agriculture issues a disaster declaration to help farmers recover from damages and losses to crops, the Small Business Administration issues a declaration to eligible entities affected by the same disaster," said Frank Skaggs, director of SBA's Field Operations Center East in Atlanta.
Under this declaration, the SBA's Economic Injury Disaster Loan program is available to eligible farm-related and nonfarm-related entities that suffered financial losses as a direct result of this disaster. With the exception of aquacultural enterprises, SBA cannot provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers or ranchers. Nurseries are eligible to apply for economic injury disaster loans for losses caused by drought conditions.
The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates of 3 percent for private non-profit organizations of all sizes and 4 percent for small businesses, with terms up to 30 years.  The SBA determines eligibility based on the size of the applicant, type of activity and its financial resources.  Loan amounts and terms are set by the SBA and are based on each applicant's financial condition.  These working capital loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other bills that could have been paid had the disaster not occurred.  The loans are not intended to replace lost sales or profits.
Applicants may apply online using the Electronic Loan Application (ELA) via SBA's secure website at https://disasterloan.sba.gov/ela.
Disaster loan information and application forms may also be obtained by calling the SBA's Customer Service Center at 800-659-2955 (800-877-8339 for the deaf and hard-of-hearing) or by sending an email to disastercustomerservice@sba.gov.  Loan applications can be downloaded from the SBA's website at www.sba.gov.  Completed applications should be mailed to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 
Original Article Here

Ex-U.S. Rep. Charlie Rose helped tobacco farmers


RALEIGH -- – Former U.S. Rep. Charlie Rose, who used his seat on the House Agriculture Committee to help farmers and protect the tobacco crops that brought wealth to farmers in his North Carolina district, has died, his wife said Tuesday.
Rose, 73, died of Parkinson’s disease at a hospital near their northern Alabama home, said his wife, Stacye Hefner. Rose was diagnosed with the degenerative brain disorder last year, Hefner said.
Rose, a Democrat, spent 24 years in Washington representing the 7th Congressional District, which included his hometown of Fayetteville and much of North Carolina’s southeastern region. Elected in 1972, the attorney and former prosecutor became one of the most powerful lawmakers in Congress and used his seat on the House Agriculture Committee to back the interests of farmers, especially tobacco growers back home.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/09/05/2317418/ex-us-rep-charlie-rose-helped.html#storylink=cpy
Rose’s successor in the 7th District was his former intern, Democrat Mike McIntyre, who is seeking re-election this November.
As chairman in the early 1990s of the House Administration Committee – which oversees office space, security, and lawmaker expenses – Rose was nicknamed the “mayor of the Capitol” and was said to be looking for an opening to run for speaker of the House.
But the Washington dealmaker found himself in the House minority for the first time in his career when Republicans led by soon-to-be House Speaker Newt Gingrich won broad gains in the 1994 elections.
Rose said the election resulted in a Congress full of “ideologues unwilling to compromise,” adding that they “over-promised or narrowly dedicated themselves to solving one or two issues.”
John Merritt, a longtime friend of Rose and his former chief of staff, said that Rose had a well-deserved reputation as one North Carolina’s most skilled politicians.
“A lot of people come and go and you wonder if they were ever really there,” Merritt said. “With Charlie there was no question.”
Merritt said Rose’s fascination with technology, while lesser-known than his contribution to agriculture issues, is just as important to his legacy.
Rose pushed the House of Representatives to televise its activities on C-SPAN, helped bring computers and fiber optics to Congress and was “behind just about every tech advancement Congress made while he was there,” Merritt said.
His interest in technology spilled into other areas of his life. Rose worked as a photographer at The News & Observer while he was an undergraduate student at Davidson College, and Merritt said he was the first to get anything new that came out, often before manufacturers even put new products on the shelves.
“In the mid-1970s, he even had an electric car,” Merritt said. “He would drive it all over Washington. It rode like an ox cart and always got looks, but he was on the edge of emerging technology.”
Rose announced his retirement in 1996 and started lobbying Washington with his third wife, the daughter of Rep. Bill Hefner, D-N.C.
“They had served together for 24 years. They were really, really best buddies,” Stacye Hefner said.
Rose and his wife moved to Albertville, Ala., to be near her mother after Bill Hefner died in 2009. The Roses largely gave up their lobbying work with the move.
Tony Rand, a former state senator and law partner of Rose, said he was one of the last of the great Southern Democrats of that era.
“He was great at working with people and getting things done. He loved the political process,” Rand said. “In his day, he was as good of a politician as I ever saw up close.”
Original Article Here

Easy Trade platform combines N.American agriculture with energy


(Reuters) - Progressive Fuels Limited's new trading platform is the first to let players in energy and agricultural markets in North America to incorporate mandated growing renewable fuel use into their trading strategies, the company said on Tuesday.
Called Easy Trade, the program supports real-time clearing for trade in natural gas, crude oil, heating oil, RBOB, ethanol, power and all grain markets.
"With North American government mandates, public support for greater energy security and more environmentally conscious fuel alternatives, the biofuel and grain markets will continue to expand and trade more actively." said Curtis Chandler, president of the company.
In 2012, government mandates call for 13.2 billion gallons (50 billion liters) of conventional renewable fuels like ethanol, up from 12.6 billion gallons in 2011, as required by the U.S. EPA. Total conventional renewable fuel component for 2022 is mandated at 15 billion gallons.
The Easy Trade platform was developed in conjunction with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange .
 Original Article Here

How Agriculture Stacks Up on the Fiscal Cliff


The Congressional Budget Office recently released its latest update on the budget and economic situation last week which showed a grim picture for the economy if Congress allows it to go over the so-called "fiscal cliff."
The term fiscal cliff is often used to describe the mix of automatic tax increases and spending cuts expected at the end of this year. For agriculture this is important in terms of the nation's appetite for spending, interest rates and other key tax changes including estate and capital gains taxes.
The CBO report said the nation would be plunged into recession and unemployment would again grow to more than 9% if Congress allows the economy to go over the so-called fiscal cliff.
"This is another red-flag warning us of what we already know: Our nation's current economic path is unsustainable and time for action is growing short,” said Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., “Congress must get serious about where we're heading and act in a bipartisan fashion before our economic train runs off the cliff.”
In remarks to the Western Dakota Estate Planning Council, Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said he continues to meet with a small group of Republican and Democratic senators who are working on a bipartisan and balanced long-term deficit reduction plan, while upwards of 40-plus Republican and Democratic Senators are supporting and encouraging their efforts. The group believes deficits need to be reduced by at least some $4 trillion over the next 10 years, and is using the much heralded Simpson-Bowles Fiscal Commission plan as its framework.
Conrad said a lot of important behind-the-scenes work is being done now. He expressed concern that if unchanged, the Fiscal Cliff could harm the near-term economy. He went on to say that the pressure to avoid the Fiscal Cliff could help prompt lawmakers to take on the politically difficult task of passing a comprehensive plan.
“As we look to avoid the Fiscal Cliff, it is my hope that we can replace the scheduled arbitrary, across-the-board sequester cuts and tax increases with even more savings from a balanced and comprehensive plan, like the Bowles-Simpson framework, that includes savings from entitlements, including health care, and tax reform that raises revenue,” said Conrad.
In talks last fall to avoid sequestration, the House and Senate agriculture committees were the most successful at proposing budget savings by sketching out a farm bill framework that provided $23 billion in cuts.
Even if the House never passes a farm bill, a similar type of proposal could again come up this fall after the election, said Pat Westhoff, director of the University of Missouri's Food & Agricultural Policy Research Institute.
If the election solidifies the status quo of a Democrat-controlled Senate and Democrat as President, there is a good chance that the farm bill could be included during lame-duck discussions of larger budgetary savings and extending certain tax benefits, he noted.
If Republicans take over both chambers of Congress and the presidency, those major items are less likely to get done during the lame-duck session and instead would be pushed to January, using short-term extensions to last from now until then, Westhoff said. In theory, this could mean that lawmakers may have to start from scratch on the farm bill, with a much bigger bull's-eye on spending.
Original Article Here

Opinion: the dual drought grip on U.S. agriculture


By Greenscans co-founder and BerryBroad Juanita Gaglio 
It has been a summer that both farmers and consumers will not forget, with two droughts very different in nature that have been affecting retail prices. We view news images of scorching farmland and cattle suffering, due to a prolonged 
period of no rain with record-breaking high temperatures adversely affecting 55% of the U.S. To make matters worse, on another front we are facing a labor drought due to a shortage of legally available agricultural workers.
Prolonged dry spell in Midwest and Southeast
More than half of all U.S counties have been designated disaster zones by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Not since the 1956 drought has such a large geographic area (55%) of the country been impacted. The historic Dust Bowl era is well known with a drought that covered 58% of the U.S. in that year.  The situation affecting farmers, their livestock and crops, and even the flow of the Mississippi River, is as heartbreaking today as it was back then.
At the turn of the century, settlers arrived to farm the rich land of the Southern Plain states that yielded both great harvests and profits. Iowa-based Three Rivers Ag Consulting owner Frank Moore, who is also a corn and soybean farmer, explains that this geographical area of the U.S has historically experienced an 18-year drought cycle for the last 17 years.
“In contrast to the past drought conditions, this has been the longest period, twenty-four years, that the area has gone through without a drought occurring,” he tells www.freshfruitportal.com.
Lessons from the past have vastly improved farm practices with better soil conservation and modern hybrid seeds that are resistant to drought conditions two to three years away, yet the main concern today is the pernicious extended dry spell.
“The drought actually began in November and has been characterized by lots of geographical variability. There was a lot of variability even in the same field,” adds Dan Towery of Ag Conservation Solutions in Lafayette, Indiana.
“The drought affected pockets of corn and soybean crops with corn hit the worst due to the crops requirements for more water.  With corn in such wide demand from feeding cattle and in materials, many people are suffering and are going to see it in increased prices.”
He says corn crops were very short on moisture when 100°F (37.8°C) plus temperatures arrived, greatly affecting pollination or causing corn kernels to abort. However, he clarifies there are still pockets of farms with decent crops and areas with 50% yields, while some soybean farms have fared all right.
“Soybean yields may still be halfway decent although in some areas the soybeans burned up back in July.”
Generational farmers are commenting that they have never seen weather like this before. What makes this dry spell different and of concern is that climatologist have labeled it a “flash drought” because in contrast to what happened in 1956, it did not develop over multiple seasons or years, but in a matter of months and is still unfolding.
With no end in sight, topsoil has turned dry while “crops, pasture and rangeland have deteriorated at a rate rarely seen in the last 18 years”, according to the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) based in Asheville, North Carolina.
What was expected to be a boom year for corn farmers sowing 96.4 million acres – the most since 1937 – has now given way to tremendous uncertainty with 38% of the corn crop described as labeled in poor or very poor condition by the USDA, with 57% of pastures and range land graded very poor to poor.
California – San Joaquin Valley experiences a different “Grapes of Wrath”
The famous novel “The Grapes of Wrath” by John Steinbeck came out of the Dust Bowl period; a story of one of many families migrating to California’s farming fields. It is estimated that during this time about 300,000-400,000 people moved to California with a certain percentage relocating to farm labor camps.
Fast forward decades later, a similar climatic situation exists in the Plain states with a political impasse in California leaving crops to rot in fields due to lack of immigrant labor. According to the Immigration Compliance Group, “an estimated 75% of California’s agricultural workforce is foreign-born, primarily in Mexico and about half the workers are believed to be unauthorized”. A political compromise has yet to be found between the government’s mandated E-Verify and the proposed guest worker program, and it is our nation’s agricultural industry that suffers as a result.
The problem extends much further than California, from the apple fields in Washington to the orange farms of Florida and fruit orchards in between. It seems the government is in crackdown mode with the election year, meaning fewer farmers are willing to risk taking in illegal workers.
We’re talking about a political football without any touchdown in sight, and the game has gone nowhere under both parties dating back to the Bush Jnr administration. It’s no secret that most farmers are Republicans but somehow the party has done little to resolve this issue, while Obama hasn’t helped the situation with more restrictions now than before.
It seems like common sense to me that one of our country’s biggest industries could support itself with legal labor. Sound idealistic? Well it shouldn’t be. Our nation is built on the free market ideal, so it shouldn’t be that half our agricultural workers are unauthorized. There must be a way to ‘legalize’ them so that our economy and labor markets can flow more freely. They’re doing the job anyway, supporting the economy and our exports.
The idea of ‘legalizing’ does not even mean making these workers residents or citizens, but giving them the dignity of being authorized, rather than hiding away from authorities to make a living. A change in this policy to a more dynamic guest worker scheme would improve the welfare of ‘illegals’ who could no longer be labeled this way, as well as the farmers who employ them; not to mention there would be less fruit left to rot on our farms. An election year should not be the excuse for labor problems, but the trigger for immigrant worker reform.
Getting our own people to work?
The other question is whether we could get more U.S. citizens working on our farms. It has been a difficult task in the past, but you have to keep in mind that our unemployment rate hit 8.3% in July, and that doesn’t include people who have given up looking. I was shocked to see Americans picking fruit as guest workers in Tasmania on a trip to Australia last year, and when I told that to people here in California they were surprised too. Here we are with a shortage of farm labor and our own citizens are on the other side of the Pacific Ocean harvesting asparagus.
If our young people are willing to go as far away as Tasmania to pick fruit, why can’t we get them to move across our own country? It probably has to do with a mix of cultural experience and the wages they pay to work on farms in Australia, at more than US$20 an hour. I’m pretty sure most farm owners would laugh off the idea of paying such an exorbitant rate, but the reality is that most developed countries pay their farmhands more than we do, and they still manage to compete. Every season we still buy fruit from places like Australia, New Zealand and the European Union.
Is it really unimaginable that young unemployed Americans would be willing to travel across the country for the cultural experience of working on a farm, perhaps with a slightly higher wage? Maybe they wouldn’t be willing to do it, or maybe it hasn’t been promoted. I would be interested to know if it has. Could the government provide assistance to help push up the wage and attract workers? After all our taxes go towards billions of dollars worth of crop insurance subsidies ever year.
If we don’t find some kind of solution to this labor problem it will ultimately mean less production here and more imports from abroad.
Affects of both droughts on farmers, consumers and importers
Both droughts could have dire consequences on the anemic U.S economy both in lost income to farmers and higher retail food prices to consumers. The U.S is the world’s largest grower and exporter of corn, government figures show, the crop valued at $76.5 billion in 2011 followed by soybeans, hay and wheat.
Furthermore, investors and insurance analysts are raising questions over the farmland boom’s sustainability. Insurance payments are beginning to play a bigger role in supporting the farmer and land prices. In the case of the California labor drought, California crops will continue to be at peril without people to work the harvest and, furthermore, according to California Senator Diane Feinstein, at least 84,155 production acres and 22,285 jobs have moved to Mexico.
In the case of corn, the question is who will benefit or suffer; the consumer, cattle or the refinery? The consumer will have sticker shock as corn can be found in everything from whiskey to high fructose syrup to ethanol. High corn prices will affect where the corn goes first; to feed cattle or to refineries for ethanol. Calls to waive the ethanol mandate are growing and livestock feed is being rationed. One thing is certain, with the lack of corn and soybeans to fulfill contracts, Argentina and Brazil will benefit in shipping these crops to North America companies.
Although consumers will not see immediate price hikes at the supermarket, the government forecasts that food prices will rise by about 3.4-4.5%. The USDA estimates that a whole chicken costing US$4.50 in 2011 will cost closer to US$5 next year. A typical family food budget could increase to US$250-300 within 10-12 months on basic items; beef, poultry and dairy products, according to the USDA Economic Research Service.
The jury is still out on the financial blow to crops and livestock, with some analysts raising concerns that this drought could turn into the type of multilayered event that damaged the farm belt in the 1950s and  before that during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. Could this be the resurrection of the 1930s “Last Man’s Club”?
During the bleak Dust Bowl days, John McCarty, editor of the Dalhart Texan created The Last Man’s Club, designed to promote a spirit of courage. Judge Cowen recalls the pledge members had to sign: “In the absence of an act of God, serious family injury, or some other emergency, I pledge to stay here as the last man and to do everything I can to help other last men remain in this country. We promise to stay here ’till hell freezes over and skate out on the ice”.
The Midwest drought will be easier to make a comeback with heartier crop cover and hybrid seeds to withstand intense heat, but on the other side of the country, the California labor drought will not be as easy to ameliorate. Politics does not blow like the winds of nature, there will be further debate and I daresay that the Midwest will make a comeback before the immigrant workers return to work the “Grapes of Wrath” in California.
 Original Article Here

Guest Post: Agriculture and Employment in Africa


This is a guest post by Owen Cylke. Mr. Cylke is a development professional and a retired senior foreign service officer with USAID.
This year 10 million young Africans will enter the workforce. This number will continue to increase until 2030 when it will peak at about 18 million annual new entrants to the workforce.
With seventy percent of the African population (and poverty) firmly rooted in rural areas, and development strategies focused on agriculture, will farms be able to absorb these numbers? Demonstrably not.
Africa today is the only region in the world where agriculture continues to play the leading role in economic growth and employment. But subsistence farms are already too small to absorb additional labor. Commercial farms are dependent on improving productivity, by definition labor displacing.
African leaders recognize agricultural employment cannot keep pace with population growth, and are promoting a shift towards manufacturing, and other types of industrial production and services.
What does this mean for public policy? First, that a development strategy focused almost exclusively on agriculture is only half right. True, agriculture is necessary to provide increased food supplies and higher rural incomes. And agriculture will have to play an important role in the transition to other types of economic activity, such as enlarging markets for urban output. But, as noted above, agricultural success carries with it a declining relevance to the growing pool of employment seekers.
Second, a shift from agriculture to industry will not necessarily guarantee enough jobs to meet demand. Today’s labor markets are characterized by informality, inequity, and unreliability – this largely the result of the laissez faire, free market approaches promoted by the international development and economic communities.
Public policy must play a role – a policy regime that extends beyond agriculture (PDF) (and even labor markets themselves) to macroeconomic policy, financial institutions, international economic arrangements, territorial development, demographics, migration and gender policy.
Third, neither the desired sectoral shift nor employment goals will be accomplished automatically. In addition to public policy, they will need an international development and aid strategy that links to and is supportive of that policy.
Today, African thinking and direction stand in uneasy tension with the fixed focus of the international development and economic communities on agriculture and their insistence on the primacy of the market. This tension exists despite the aspirations of the Paris/Accra Declaration on AID Effectiveness (PDF).
Original Article Here

 
Powered by Blogger